Texas 15th Court of Appeals, Breach of Contract
automatic /
June 8, 2026
The Fifteenth Court of Appeals held that a pool construction contract’s limitation of remedy to “repair” encompasses cost-to-complete damages as well as cost-to-repair, because construing “repair” to exclude unfinished work would render the contractor’s promise illusory; it also held that a contractor whose quantum meruit recovery is offset by the owner’s larger breach-of-contract damages award is not a “prevailing party” entitled to Chapter 38 attorney’s fees.
Texas 15th Court of Appeals, Civil Procedure, Oil & Gas, Probate, Real Estate
automatic /
June 8, 2026
The Fifteenth Court of Appeals affirmed the jury’s finding that a sister did not breach her fiduciary duty in accepting a deed to mineral executive rights from her brother, but vacated the adverse-possession declaration because the company asserting ownership was never joined as a party, rendering the declaration advisory and jurisdictionally void.
Texas 15th Court of Appeals, Administrative Law, Constitutional, healthcare
automatic /
June 8, 2026
The Texas Fifteenth Court of Appeals held that a Medicaid pharmacy has no vested right to individualized notice of Provider Manual changes, that its pre-enforcement due process and declaratory judgment claims were barred by sovereign immunity, and that dismissal with prejudice was proper after the pharmacy amended its pleadings but still failed to state a cognizable claim.
Texas 15th Court of Appeals, Constitutional, Criminal
automatic /
June 8, 2026
The Texas Fifteenth Court of Appeals reversed the trial court and dismissed challenges to Texas Occupations Code § 108.052(2)’s automatic denial of social worker licenses to applicants with prior violent felony convictions, holding that the categorical disqualification survives rational-basis review under Patel because protecting vulnerable patients is a legitimate government interest and the bar is not oppressively burdensome.
Texas 15th Court of Appeals, Insurance Coverage
automatic /
June 8, 2026
The Texas Fifteenth Court of Appeals affirmed a district court ruling that the PUC’s mid-proceeding modification of its rate filing package without Texas Register publication was arbitrary and capricious, requiring application of the pre-amendment 0.25x debt service coverage adder presumption, while upholding the Commission’s exclusion of a municipal utility’s general fund transfer return-on-investment component as insufficiently substantiated.