Texas Case Summaries
Federal Enforcement »

USA v. Trujillo — District court accepts guilty plea to federal fentanyl conspiracy

Reported / Citable

Case
United States v. Sebastian Angel Trujillo
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Sherman Division
Judge
AMOS L. MAZZANT (Barack Obama, 2014)
Date Decided
April 29, 2024
Docket No.
4:23-cr-00231
Topics
Drug trafficking, Federal conspiracy, Guilty plea, Fentanyl distribution
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Sebastian Angel Trujillo faced charges under the Third Superseding Indictment in the Eastern District of Texas. The case was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge for administration of Trujillo’s guilty plea pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11. The magistrate conducted the required hearing and issued Findings of Fact and a Recommendation regarding the guilty plea. Neither the prosecution nor the defense objected to the magistrate’s findings.

The Court’s Holding

The district court adopted in full the Magistrate Judge’s Findings of Fact and Recommendation on Guilty Plea. The court accepted Trujillo’s guilty plea to Count One of the Third Superseding Indictment, charging conspiracy to distribute and possess with intent to distribute fentanyl in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846.

The court found Trujillo guilty of the conspiracy charge. However, the court deferred final acceptance of the plea agreement pending review of the presentence investigation report, a standard procedural step before sentencing.

Key Takeaways

  • Defendant pleaded guilty to federal conspiracy to distribute and possess fentanyl with intent to distribute
  • Court adopted magistrate judge’s recommendations without objection from either party
  • Sentencing pending completion of presentence report

Why It Matters

Fentanyl conspiracy convictions reflect ongoing federal enforcement efforts against opioid trafficking. The guilty plea resolves the charges against Trujillo and moves the case toward sentencing, where the presentence report will inform the court’s determination of an appropriate sentence under the federal sentencing guidelines.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top