Texas Case Summaries
Federal Enforcement »

USA v. Trejo Montes — magistrate judge recommended accepting guilty plea for illegal reentry

Reported / Citable

Case
United States of America v. Jesus Enrique Trejo Montes
Court
U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas, Del Rio Division
Judge
Matthew H. Watters, United States Magistrate Judge
Date Decided
July 30, 2026
Docket No.
DR:26-CR-01345(1)-AM
Topics
Criminal procedure; Guilty plea; Illegal reentry

Background

Jesus Enrique Trejo Montes appeared with counsel before Magistrate Judge Matthew H. Watters for a felony guilty-plea proceeding referred under a general order. The magistrate judge advised Trejo Montes of his right to have the plea taken by a district judge and gave the Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11 admonishments.

Trejo Montes, with counsel’s advice, consented to the magistrate judge’s taking of his plea. He pleaded guilty without a plea agreement to Count One of the indictment, charging illegal reentry into the United States. Sentencing was reserved for the presiding district judge.

The Court’s Holding

The magistrate judge found that Trejo Montes understood the charge, potential penalties, and his constitutional and statutory rights; knowingly and voluntarily waived those rights; and was competent to plead guilty. The court also found that the plea was voluntary and supported by a sufficient factual basis.

Accordingly, the magistrate judge found Trejo Montes guilty of the offense to which he pleaded and recommended that the district court accept the plea and enter a judgment of guilt. The recommendation advised the parties that objections were due within 14 days.

Key Takeaways

  • The defendant pleaded guilty to illegal reentry without a plea agreement.
  • The magistrate judge found the Rule 11 plea requirements satisfied, including competency, voluntariness, and a factual basis.
  • The filing is a recommendation to the district judge, who will conduct sentencing.

Why It Matters

The ruling advances the prosecution to acceptance of the plea and sentencing, subject to the district court’s review of any timely objections. It does not impose sentence or resolve any sentencing issues.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top