Texas Case Summaries
Federal Enforcement »

USA v. Tran — magistrate judge recommends accepting illegal-reentry guilty plea

Reported / Citable

Case
United States of America v. Bao Ngoc Tran
Court
U.S. District Court — Western District of Texas
Judge
Joseph A. Cordova
Date Decided
October 6, 2026
Docket No.
2:26-cr-02628
Topics
criminal procedure; guilty plea; illegal reentry; magistrate judge

Background

Bao Ngoc Tran appeared with counsel before U.S. Magistrate Judge Joseph A. Cordova for entry of a felony guilty plea. The case had been referred under a general order for the magistrate judge to take the plea.

After Rule 11 admonishments, Tran pleaded guilty without a plea agreement to Count One, illegal reentry into the United States in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Sentencing was reserved for the presiding district judge.

The Court’s Holding

The magistrate judge found that Tran consented to having the plea taken by the magistrate judge; understood the charge, penalties, and rights; and knowingly, freely, and voluntarily waived those rights and entered his plea.

The magistrate judge also found Tran competent and concluded that a sufficient factual basis supported the plea. Judge Cordova found Tran guilty of the charged offense and recommended that the district judge accept the plea and enter a judgment of guilt.

Key Takeaways

  • Tran pleaded guilty to illegal reentry under 8 U.S.C. § 1326 without a plea agreement.
  • The magistrate judge concluded that the Rule 11 plea requirements were satisfied.
  • The recommendation remains subject to objections and acceptance by the district judge; sentencing will be conducted by the presiding district judge.

Why It Matters

The filing records the magistrate judge’s recommendation following a guilty-plea proceeding, rather than a final sentencing decision. Parties have 14 days to object to the findings and recommendation.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top