Reported / Citable
Background
Margarito Sanchez-Camacho was charged with illegal re-entry into the United States under Count One of an indictment. On June 11, 2026, the defendant appeared before United States Magistrate Judge Matthew H. Watters with his counsel. The defendant consented to have his guilty plea taken by the magistrate judge rather than the district judge, with sentencing to be conducted by the presiding district judge.
The Court’s Holding
Magistrate Judge Watters found that the defendant understood the nature of the charges and associated penalties. The defendant also understood his constitutional and statutory rights and freely and voluntarily waived them with the advice of counsel. The magistrate found the defendant’s guilty plea to Count One (illegal re-entry) was made freely, voluntarily, and without a plea agreement.
The magistrate determined the defendant is competent to enter a guilty plea and that there is sufficient factual basis for the plea. Based on these findings, the magistrate recommended acceptance of the guilty plea and entry of a judgment of guilt against the defendant. The case was referred to the presiding United States District Judge for sentencing.
Key Takeaways
- Defendant pled guilty without a plea agreement after consulting with counsel
- Magistrate found all Rule 11 requirements satisfied—knowing and voluntary waiver of rights with adequate factual basis
- Sentencing remains pending before the district judge
Why It Matters
This case reflects the standard procedure for federal guilty pleas in illegal re-entry cases, which constitute a significant portion of federal criminal dockets, particularly in border districts. The magistrate’s thorough compliance findings ensure the plea withstands appellate scrutiny under federal criminal procedure rules.