Reported / Citable
Background
Ernesto Garcia-Juarez appeared with counsel before U.S. Magistrate Judge Matthew H. Watters for a felony guilty-plea proceeding. The matter had been referred under a general order for the magistrate judge to take the plea.
After receiving Rule 11 admonishments, Garcia-Juarez consented to the magistrate judge’s taking of his plea. He pleaded guilty, without a plea agreement, to Count One of the indictment, charging illegal reentry into the United States.
The Court’s Holding
The magistrate judge found that Garcia-Juarez understood the charge, possible penalties, and his constitutional and statutory rights; knowingly and voluntarily waived those rights; was competent; and entered his plea freely and voluntarily. The judge also found a sufficient factual basis for the plea.
The findings state that Garcia-Juarez was found guilty of the charge to which he pleaded and acknowledge that he may be subject to restitution. The magistrate judge recommended that the district judge accept the plea and enter a judgment of guilt, with sentencing to be conducted by the presiding district judge.
Key Takeaways
- The recommendation follows a Rule 11 plea colloquy and finds the plea knowing, voluntary, and supported by a factual basis.
- Garcia-Juarez pleaded guilty to illegal reentry without a plea agreement.
- Any written objections to the findings and recommendation are due within 14 days; absent objections, the stated review and appellate consequences apply.
Why It Matters
This is a plea-stage recommendation, not a final sentencing decision. If adopted, it will establish Garcia-Juarez’s conviction for the illegal-reentry count, while sentencing remains for the presiding district judge.