Texas Case Summaries
Federal Enforcement »

USA v. Cuautle-Reyes — Magistrate judge recommended accepting defendant’s guilty plea

Reported / Citable

Case
United States of America v. David Cuautle-Reyes
Court
U.S. District Court — Western District of Texas
Judge
MIGUEL A. TORRES
Date Decided
2026-07-23
Docket No.
3:26-cr-01566
Topics
Guilty Plea; Rule 11; Immigration Offense

Background

David Cuautle-Reyes appeared with counsel before a U.S. magistrate judge and pleaded guilty to Count One of the indictment. The count charged false personation in immigration matters in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1546(a).

Cuautle-Reyes consented to entering his plea before a magistrate judge, subject to final approval and sentencing by the presiding district judge. The magistrate judge conducted the plea proceeding under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11.

The Court’s Holding

The magistrate judge found that Cuautle-Reyes was competent and that his plea was free, knowing, and voluntary. The judge also found that Cuautle-Reyes understood the charge, his trial rights, the immigration consequences of pleading guilty, the possible penalties, and the advisory role of the Sentencing Guidelines.

After further finding that the plea was not induced by promises, threats, or force and that a factual basis supported it, the magistrate judge recommended that the district judge accept the guilty plea and enter a judgment of guilt. The report and recommendation did not itself finally accept the plea or impose a sentence.

Key Takeaways

  • Cuautle-Reyes pleaded guilty to false personation in immigration matters under 18 U.S.C. § 1546(a).
  • The Rule 11 findings established that he understood his rights, the charge, the potential penalties, and the immigration consequences of his plea.
  • Final acceptance of the plea and sentencing remain with the presiding district judge.

Why It Matters

The report documents the safeguards required before a federal court may accept a guilty plea, including competency, voluntariness, an understanding of waived rights, and a factual basis for the plea. It also underscores that a plea taken by a magistrate judge may remain subject to the district judge’s final approval.

The notice warns that failing to object to the findings before sentencing may limit district-court reconsideration and bar appellate review of factual findings later accepted or adopted by the district judge.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top