Texas Case Summaries
Federal Enforcement »

USA v. Adarme — Magistrate judge recommended acceptance of guilty plea to conspiracy to transport illegal aliens

Reported / Citable

Case
United States v. Ivan Dario Adarme
Court
U.S. District Court, Western District of Texas (Del Rio Division)
Judge
JOSEPH A CORDOVA (U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas, 2023)
Date Decided
June 15, 2026
Docket No.
2:26-cr-00547-EG
Topics
Immigration law, Criminal conspiracy, Alien smuggling
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Ivan Dario Adarme was charged with conspiracy to transport illegal aliens, a federal offense under 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(1)(A)(v)(I) & (B)(i). On June 15, 2026, the defendant appeared before United States Magistrate Judge Joseph A. Cordova with his counsel to enter a guilty plea pursuant to a plea agreement. The magistrate judge was appointed to take the felony plea under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(3), with sentencing to be conducted by the presiding United States District Judge Ernest Gonzalez.

Prior to accepting the plea, the magistrate judge personally addressed the defendant in open court and admonished him of his rights under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11, including his right to have the plea taken by a district judge rather than a magistrate judge.

The Court’s Holding

The magistrate judge recommended acceptance of the defendant’s guilty plea to Count One of the indictment. The court found that the defendant, after consultation with counsel, voluntarily consented to the plea; understood the nature of the charges and penalties; understood and waived his constitutional and statutory rights; and entered the plea freely and voluntarily.

The magistrate judge found the defendant competent to enter the plea and determined there was sufficient factual basis for the guilty plea. Based on these findings, the court recommended that the defendant’s plea be accepted and that a judgment of guilt be entered against him. The defendant was advised that he may be subject to restitution. Sentencing remains pending before the District Judge.

Key Takeaways

  • Defendant pleaded guilty to federal conspiracy to transport illegal aliens under 8 U.S.C. § 1324
  • The plea was made pursuant to a plea agreement after the defendant waived his constitutional rights
  • The magistrate judge found the plea voluntary, knowing, and supported by sufficient factual basis
  • Final sentencing will be determined by the District Judge; the defendant is subject to potential restitution

Why It Matters

This case reflects federal enforcement of immigration law regarding human smuggling and alien transportation. Conspiracy charges under § 1324 carry serious penalties and apply to individuals involved in organized efforts to transport undocumented immigrants across borders. The guilty plea expedites proceedings while preserving the defendant’s appellate rights if objections to the magistrate’s recommendation are filed within 14 days.

The case underscores the government’s continued focus on prosecuting alien smuggling operations, particularly in border regions like the Western District of Texas, which handles significant immigration enforcement matters.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top