Texas Case Summaries
Federal Enforcement »

United States v. Vazquez — magistrate judge recommends accepting guilty plea

Reported / Citable

Case
United States of America v. Rolando Marquez Vazquez
Court
U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas, Del Rio Division
Judge
Joseph A. Cordova
Date Decided
July 13, 2026
Docket No.
2:26-cr-01012
Topics
Criminal procedure; Guilty plea; Alien transportation

Background

Rolando Marquez Vazquez appeared with counsel before U.S. Magistrate Judge Joseph A. Cordova for a felony guilty-plea hearing. The case had been referred under a general order for the taking of a felony plea.

After receiving Rule 11 admonishments, Vazquez consented to having the magistrate judge take his plea. He pleaded guilty, without a plea agreement, to Count One: conspiracy to transport illegal aliens, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(1)(A)(v)(I) and (B)(i).

The Court’s Holding

The magistrate judge found that Vazquez understood the charge, penalties, and his constitutional and statutory rights; voluntarily waived those rights; was competent to plead; and entered his plea freely and voluntarily. The magistrate judge also found a sufficient factual basis for the plea.

The magistrate judge found Vazquez guilty of the charged offense and recommended that the district judge accept the guilty plea and enter a judgment of guilt. Sentencing remains for the presiding district judge.

Key Takeaways

  • The recommendation concerns a guilty plea, not a final sentencing decision.
  • Vazquez pleaded guilty without a plea agreement.
  • Parties have 14 days to object to the findings and recommendation.

Why It Matters

The order clears the case for district-court review of the recommended plea acceptance and for sentencing. Absent timely objections, the parties risk forfeiting de novo review of the recommended findings and conclusions.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top