Reported / Citable
Background
Marco Antonio Vasquez-Midence was charged with illegal reentry into the United States. The matter was referred by general order to U.S. Magistrate Judge Matthew H. Watters to conduct the felony guilty-plea proceeding.
At a July 7, 2026 hearing, Vasquez-Midence appeared with counsel and consented to have the magistrate judge take his plea. After receiving the required Rule 11 admonishments, he pleaded guilty to Count One of the indictment without a plea agreement.
The Court’s Holding
The magistrate judge found that Vasquez-Midence understood the charge, potential penalties, and rights he was waiving; was competent to plead; and entered the plea freely and voluntarily. The magistrate judge also found a sufficient factual basis for the plea and noted that Vasquez-Midence acknowledged he could be subject to restitution.
Based on those findings, the magistrate judge recommended that the district judge accept the guilty plea and enter a judgment of guilt. The case was referred to the presiding district judge for sentencing, and the parties were notified that objections to the findings and recommendation were due within 14 days after receipt.
Key Takeaways
- Vasquez-Midence pleaded guilty to illegal reentry without a plea agreement.
- The magistrate judge found the plea competent, knowing, voluntary, and supported by a sufficient factual basis.
- The recommendation does not impose a sentence; sentencing remains before the presiding district judge.
Why It Matters
The filing records the magistrate judge’s Rule 11 findings and recommends formal acceptance of the plea. It also preserves the parties’ opportunity to object before the district judge acts on the recommendation.