Reported / Citable
Background
Victor Alexis Ulloa-Bueso appeared with counsel before U.S. Magistrate Judge Matthew H. Watters for a felony guilty-plea proceeding. Ulloa-Bueso consented to having the magistrate judge take his plea, while sentencing was reserved for the presiding district judge.
After receiving Rule 11 admonishments, Ulloa-Bueso pleaded guilty without a plea agreement to Count One of the indictment, charging illegal reentry into the United States.
The Court’s Holding
Judge Watters found that Ulloa-Bueso understood the charge, potential penalties, and the rights he was waiving; that he was competent; and that his plea was knowing, free, and voluntary. The magistrate judge also found a sufficient factual basis for the plea.
The magistrate judge found Ulloa-Bueso guilty of the offense to which he pleaded and recommended that the district judge accept the plea and enter a judgment of guilt. The matter was referred to the presiding district judge for sentencing.
Key Takeaways
- The defendant pleaded guilty to illegal reentry without a plea agreement.
- The magistrate judge recommended acceptance of the plea after finding Rule 11 compliance and a factual basis.
- Parties have 14 days to object to the findings and recommendation.
Why It Matters
The ruling is a plea-stage recommendation, not a sentencing decision. Absent timely objections, the district judge may accept the recommendation, enter judgment, and proceed to sentencing.