Texas Case Summaries
Federal Enforcement »

United States v. Suazo-Orellana — magistrate judge recommended accepting guilty plea

Reported / Citable

Case
United States of America v. Junior Josue Suazo-Orellana
Court
U.S. District Court — Western District of Texas
Judge
Matthew H. Watters
Date Decided
2026-08-06
Docket No.
2:26-cr-01753
Topics
Criminal procedure; Guilty plea; Illegal reentry

Background

Junior Josue Suazo-Orellana appeared with counsel before U.S. Magistrate Judge Matthew H. Watters for a felony guilty-plea proceeding. The matter had been referred under a general order for the taking of the plea.

After Rule 11 admonishments, Suazo-Orellana consented to having the magistrate judge take his plea. He pleaded guilty, without a plea agreement, to Count One of the indictment charging illegal reentry into the United States.

The Court’s Holding

The magistrate judge found that Suazo-Orellana understood the charge, penalties, and his constitutional and statutory rights; voluntarily waived those rights; was competent to plead; and entered his plea freely and voluntarily.

The magistrate judge also found a sufficient factual basis for the plea and found Suazo-Orellana guilty of the charge to which he pleaded. The magistrate judge recommended that the district judge accept the plea and enter a judgment of guilt; sentencing was referred to the presiding district judge.

Key Takeaways

  • The recommendation, rather than a final acceptance order, followed the guilty-plea proceeding.
  • The defendant pleaded guilty to illegal reentry without a plea agreement.
  • Parties had 14 days to object to the findings and recommendation.

Why It Matters

The ruling records the Rule 11 findings supporting the guilty plea and places the case before the district judge for any objections, acceptance of the plea, entry of judgment, and sentencing.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top