Reported / Citable
Background
Aldrin Eustorgio Montano de la Espriella was charged with illegal reentry into the United States. The matter was referred by general order to a U.S. magistrate judge to take his felony guilty plea under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(3).
Montano de la Espriella appeared with counsel on July 7, 2026. After being advised that he could have the district judge take his plea and receiving the admonishments required by Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11, he consented to proceed before the magistrate judge and pleaded guilty to Count One without a plea agreement.
The Court’s Holding
The magistrate judge found that Montano de la Espriella understood the charge, penalties, and rights he was waiving; was competent; and entered his plea freely and voluntarily. The judge also found a sufficient factual basis for the plea and noted that the defendant acknowledged he could be subject to restitution.
Based on those findings, the magistrate judge recommended that the district judge accept the guilty plea and enter a judgment of guilt. The case was referred to the presiding district judge for sentencing, and the parties were given 14 days after receiving the report to file objections.
Key Takeaways
- The defendant pleaded guilty to illegal reentry without a plea agreement.
- The magistrate judge found the plea knowing, voluntary, competent, and supported by a sufficient factual basis.
- The report recommends acceptance of the plea; sentencing remains for the presiding district judge.
Why It Matters
The report documents the Rule 11 safeguards supporting the validity of the felony guilty plea. It is a recommendation to the district judge, not a sentencing decision, and preserves a 14-day period for objections.