Texas Case Summaries
Federal Enforcement »

United States v. Cruz-Lara — magistrate judge recommends accepting guilty plea to illegal reentry

Reported / Citable

Case
United States of America v. Evin Adonay Cruz-Lara
Court
U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas
Judge
Matthew H. Watters
Date Decided
August 7, 2026
Docket No.
DR:26-CR-02205(1)-AM
Topics
Criminal procedure; Guilty plea; Illegal reentry

Background

Evin Adonay Cruz-Lara appeared with counsel before U.S. Magistrate Judge Matthew H. Watters for a felony guilty-plea proceeding. Cruz-Lara consented to having the magistrate judge take his plea, while sentencing remains with Chief U.S. District Judge Alia Moses.

After Rule 11 admonishments, Cruz-Lara pleaded guilty without a plea agreement to Count One of the indictment, charging illegal reentry into the United States.

The Court’s Holding

Judge Watters found that Cruz-Lara understood the charge, penalties, and his constitutional and statutory rights; voluntarily waived those rights; and was competent to plead guilty. The magistrate judge also found that the plea was voluntary and supported by a sufficient factual basis.

The magistrate judge found Cruz-Lara guilty of the charge to which he pleaded and recommended that the district court accept the guilty plea and enter a judgment of guilt. The recommendation is subject to objections and review by the district court.

Key Takeaways

  • Cruz-Lara pleaded guilty to illegal reentry without a plea agreement.
  • The magistrate judge found the Rule 11 plea requirements satisfied.
  • The district judge, not the magistrate judge, will conduct sentencing.

Why It Matters

The filing is a plea recommendation, not a final sentencing decision. Unless objections alter the result, the case will proceed to the district judge for acceptance of the plea and sentencing.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top