Texas Case Summaries
Federal Enforcement »

United States v. Cabrera — Magistrate judge recommended accepting Cabrera’s felony guilty plea

Reported / Citable

Case
United States of America v. Lizbeth Cabrera
Court
U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas, Pecos Division
Judge
David B. Fannin, United States Magistrate Judge
Date Decided
July 27, 2026
Docket No.
P-26-CR-57 (4:26-cr-00057)
Topics
Guilty Plea; Alien Transportation; Rule 11; Magistrate Judges

Background

Lizbeth Cabrera appeared before U.S. Magistrate Judge David B. Fannin to plead guilty to Count Two of the indictment, which charged her under 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(1)(A)(ii) and (B)(i). The district court had referred the matter to the magistrate judge under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) for administration of the guilty plea and allocution.

Cabrera signed a written consent to proceed before the magistrate judge, and an interpreter assisted her during the proceeding. Cabrera and the government also entered into a plea agreement that was filed and disclosed in open court.

The Court’s Holding

After conducting the plea proceeding under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11, the magistrate judge found that Cabrera knowingly and voluntarily consented to the magistrate judge’s administration of the plea, subject to the district court’s final approval and imposition of sentence. The judge further found Cabrera competent, informed of the charge and the consequences of pleading guilty, and aware of the applicable punishment.

The magistrate judge also found that Cabrera’s guilty plea was knowing and voluntary and was supported by an independent factual basis establishing every essential element of the offense. He therefore recommended that the district court accept the plea agreement and guilty plea and finally adjudge Cabrera guilty. The recommendation did not itself constitute final acceptance of the plea, an adjudication of guilt, or a sentence.

Key Takeaways

  • The magistrate judge recommended accepting Cabrera’s guilty plea to transporting an alien under 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(1)(A)(ii) and (B)(i).
  • The Rule 11 proceeding established that Cabrera was competent and that her plea was knowing, voluntary, and supported by an adequate factual basis.
  • Final approval of the plea agreement, adjudication of guilt, and sentencing remain with the district court, and the parties have 14 days after service to file specific written objections.

Why It Matters

The recommendation documents the procedural safeguards required before a federal felony guilty plea may be accepted, including competency, voluntariness, knowledge of the charge and consequences, and a factual basis for the offense. It also illustrates the limited role a magistrate judge may perform by consent and referral: conducting the plea proceeding and recommending acceptance while leaving final approval and sentencing to the district court.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top