Reported / Citable
Background
Jorge Rafael Araque-Cruz appeared with counsel before U.S. Magistrate Judge Matthew H. Watters for a felony guilty-plea proceeding. The matter had been referred to the magistrate judge by general order for the taking of the plea.
After being advised under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11, Araque-Cruz consented to having the magistrate judge take his plea. He pleaded guilty, without a plea agreement, to Count One of the indictment, charging illegal reentry into the United States.
The Court’s Holding
Judge Watters found that Araque-Cruz understood the charge, potential penalties, and his constitutional and statutory rights; knowingly and voluntarily waived those rights; and was competent to plead guilty. The judge also found that the plea was voluntary and supported by a sufficient factual basis.
The magistrate judge found Araque-Cruz guilty of the count to which he pleaded and recommended that the district judge accept the plea and enter a judgment of guilt. The case was referred to the presiding district judge for sentencing.
Key Takeaways
- The defendant pleaded guilty to illegal reentry without a plea agreement.
- The magistrate judge recommended acceptance of the plea after completing the Rule 11 colloquy.
- Parties have 14 days to object to the findings and recommendation.
Why It Matters
This is a plea-stage recommendation, not a final sentencing decision. Unless objections alter the outcome, the district judge may accept the guilty plea and proceed to sentencing.