Reported / Citable
Background
Nicolas Amaya-Becerra appeared with counsel before U.S. Magistrate Judge Matthew H. Watters for a felony guilty-plea proceeding. The case had been referred to the magistrate judge under a general order for the taking of a felony plea.
After being advised of his right to have a district judge take the plea, Amaya-Becerra consented to proceeding before the magistrate judge. He pleaded guilty without a plea agreement to Count One of the indictment, charging illegal reentry into the United States.
The Court’s Holding
The magistrate judge found that Amaya-Becerra understood the charge, potential penalties, and the constitutional and statutory rights he waived. The court also found that he was competent, that his plea was knowing and voluntary, and that a sufficient factual basis supported it.
Accordingly, the magistrate judge found Amaya-Becerra guilty of the charge to which he pleaded and recommended that the district judge accept the plea and enter a judgment of guilt. Sentencing was referred to the presiding district judge.
Key Takeaways
- The defendant pleaded guilty without a plea agreement to illegal reentry.
- The magistrate judge recommended acceptance of the plea after completing Rule 11 admonishments.
- Parties have 14 days to object to the findings and recommendation.
Why It Matters
The filing is a recommendation, not the district court’s final acceptance of the plea or sentencing decision. Unless timely objections are filed, the district judge may adopt the findings and proceed to sentencing.