Texas Case Summaries
Federal Enforcement »

United States v. Aguilar — magistrate judge recommends accepting guilty plea to illegal reentry

Reported / Citable

Case
United States of America v. Hector Rene Aguilar
Court
U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas
Judge
Joseph A. Cordova
Date Decided
August 25, 2026
Docket No.
2:26-cr-01771
Topics
Criminal procedure; Guilty plea; Illegal reentry

Background

Hector Rene Aguilar appeared with counsel before U.S. Magistrate Judge Joseph A. Cordova for a felony guilty-plea proceeding. Aguilar consented to having the magistrate judge take his plea, while sentencing remains with the presiding district judge.

After Rule 11 advisements, Aguilar pleaded guilty without a plea agreement to Count One, illegal reentry into the United States in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326.

The Court’s Holding

The magistrate judge found that Aguilar understood the charge, penalties, and the rights he was waiving; was competent; and entered his plea knowingly, freely, and voluntarily. The judge also found a sufficient factual basis for the plea.

The magistrate judge found Aguilar guilty of the charged offense and recommended that the district judge accept the plea and enter a judgment of guilt. The recommendation is subject to objections within 14 days.

Key Takeaways

  • Aguilar pleaded guilty to illegal reentry under 8 U.S.C. § 1326 without a plea agreement.
  • The magistrate judge concluded that the Rule 11 requirements were satisfied.
  • The district judge, not the magistrate judge, will sentence Aguilar and decide whether to accept the recommendation.

Why It Matters

The filing is a report and recommendation, not a final district-court acceptance of the plea. It preserves the parties’ opportunity to object before the presiding district judge acts and sentencing proceeds.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top