Texas Case Summaries
Federal Enforcement »

Paxton v. Garza — Texas appeals court invalidates attorney general’s prosecutor-reporting rules

Unreported / Non-Citable

Case
Ken Paxton, in His Official Capacity as Attorney General for the State of Texas and the Office of the Attorney General for the State of Texas v. Delia Garza, in Her Official Capacity as Travis County Attorney; John Creuzot, in His Official Capacity as Dallas County Criminal District Attorney; and Brian Middleton, in His Official Capacity as District Attorney of Fort Bend County (268th Judicial District)
Court
Texas Fifteenth Court of Appeals
Judge
Chief Justice Brister; Scott K. Field (Greg Abbott, 2024); Justice Farris
Date Decided
October 1, 2026
Docket No.
15-26-00106-CV
Topics
Administrative Law; Rulemaking Authority; Local Prosecutors; Injunctive Relief
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

The Texas attorney general adopted rules requiring local prosecutors in the state’s most populous counties to prepare and produce reports containing multiple categories of information about criminal matters. The attorney general relied solely on Texas Government Code Section 41.006, which directs district and county attorneys to report requested information concerning criminal matters and the state’s interests.

District and county attorneys from several counties challenged the rules. After an earlier appeal involving a temporary injunction, the parties filed cross-motions for traditional summary judgment on remand. The trial court declared the rules invalid, determined that their promulgation constituted ultra vires acts, and permanently enjoined the attorney general from enforcing them against the appellees.

On appeal, both sides agreed that the court’s reasoning in the earlier appeal controlled and that additional briefing was unnecessary. The attorney general maintained the appeal to preserve error but offered no new arguments.

The Court’s Holding

The Fifteenth Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court’s final summary judgment. Relying on its prior analysis, the court held that Section 41.006 grants the attorney general neither express nor implied authority to promulgate the challenged rules. The trial court therefore properly declared the rules invalid and granted permanent injunctive relief.

The court emphasized that the appeal concerned only the attorney general’s authority to adopt the rules, not the attorney general’s ability to request information about criminal matters from local prosecutors on an ad hoc basis. It also lifted its temporary administrative stay and dismissed all pending motions as moot.

Key Takeaways

  • Texas Government Code Section 41.006 does not expressly or impliedly authorize the attorney general to promulgate the reporting rules in Chapter 56 of Title 1 of the Texas Administrative Code.
  • The court affirmed declaratory relief invalidating the rules and a permanent injunction barring their enforcement against the appellees.
  • The decision does not resolve whether the attorney general may obtain criminal-matters information from local prosecutors through individual, ad hoc requests.

Why It Matters

The decision limits the attorney general’s ability to convert a statutory power to request information into generally applicable administrative rules. It confirms that an agency or statewide official must have express or properly implied rulemaking authority before imposing regulatory requirements.

For Texas prosecutors, the ruling prevents enforcement of these standardized reporting rules against the appellees while leaving open the attorney general’s authority to seek information through case-specific requests.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top