Texas Case Summaries
Federal Enforcement »

Aguilar-Rodriguez — Magistrate judge recommended accepting guilty pleas on transportation and identity-theft counts

Reported / Citable

Case
United States of America v. Iram Aguilar-Rodriguez
Court
U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas, Pecos Division
Judge
David B. Fannin, U.S. Magistrate Judge
Date Decided
August 27, 2026
Docket No.
4:26-cr-00142
Topics
Guilty Plea; Alien Transportation; Identity Theft; Rule 11

Background

The district court referred the matter to U.S. Magistrate Judge David B. Fannin under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) to administer Iram Aguilar-Rodriguez’s guilty plea and allocution pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11.

Aguilar-Rodriguez agreed to plead guilty under a plea agreement to Counts Two and Three of the indictment. Count Two charged a violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(1)(A)(ii) and (B)(i), and Count Three charged a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1028(a)(7). He signed written consent to have the magistrate judge conduct the plea proceeding, subject to the district court’s final approval and sentencing authority.

The Court’s Holding

After conducting the Rule 11 proceeding, the magistrate judge found that Aguilar-Rodriguez knowingly and voluntarily consented to proceed before a magistrate judge, was competent to enter an informed plea, understood the charges and consequences, and entered a knowing and voluntary guilty plea supported by an independent factual basis establishing each offense’s essential elements.

The magistrate judge recommended—not finally ordered—that the district court accept the plea agreement and Aguilar-Rodriguez’s guilty pleas and adjudge him guilty. The recommendation provided the parties 14 days after service to file specific written objections and warned that failing to object could limit district-court and appellate review.

Key Takeaways

  • The ruling is a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation, so final acceptance of the pleas and adjudication of guilt remain with the district court.
  • The magistrate judge found that both guilty pleas complied with Rule 11 and were knowing, voluntary, and factually supported.
  • Specific written objections must be filed within 14 days after service unless the district court changes the deadline.

Why It Matters

The recommendation records the required Rule 11 findings supporting guilty pleas to federal alien-transportation and identity-theft charges. It also preserves the district judge’s responsibility to make the final decision on accepting the plea agreement, accepting the pleas, adjudicating guilt, and imposing sentence.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top