Texas Case Summaries
Federal Enforcement »

Thornton v. Wells Fargo Bank — dismissed the appeal at the appellant’s request

Unreported / Non-Citable

Case
Jo Emily Thornton v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Lawrence C. Clower, Elizabeth Ann Clower, John Lawrence Clower, Jacob Alexander Clower, Tina Clower, as Independent Executor of the Estate of John C. Clower, Jennifer Courtney Clower, Claire Jeanelle Clower, Julie Christine Clower, Jeff Clarkson Clower, Joseph Clarkson Clower, Brenton Ullman, and Elizabeth Ullman
Court
Texas Court of Appeals, Second District, Fort Worth
Judge
Walker, J. (elected 2021); Sudderth, C.J. (Rick Perry, 2015); Kerr, J. (elected 2016)
Date Decided
August 31, 2026
Docket No.
02-26-00082-CV
Topics
Appellate Procedure, Voluntary Dismissal, Costs
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Jo Emily Thornton appealed from proceedings in the 89th District Court of Wichita County, Texas, in trial court cause number 161,100-C. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., and several individuals were named as appellees.

Thornton subsequently filed an unopposed motion asking the Second Court of Appeals to dismiss her appeal. The court’s brief memorandum opinion did not describe the underlying dispute or address its merits.

The Court’s Holding

The court granted Thornton’s unopposed motion and dismissed the appeal under Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure 42.1(a)(1) and 43.2(f).

The court also directed each party to bear its own appellate costs, citing Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure 42.1(d) and 43.4. The per curiam disposition resolved only the requested dismissal and did not decide any substantive issue raised by the appeal.

Key Takeaways

  • An appellant may move to voluntarily dismiss an appeal under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.1(a)(1).
  • The court dismissed this appeal after granting Thornton’s unopposed motion.
  • Each party was required to bear its own costs of appeal.

Why It Matters

The decision illustrates the straightforward procedure for ending a Texas appeal at the appellant’s request. Because the court dismissed the case without reaching the merits, the opinion establishes no substantive ruling on the parties’ underlying dispute.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top