Texas Case Summaries
Federal Enforcement »

Salazar v. State — Fourth Court of Appeals granted Salazar’s motion to dismiss his appeal

Unreported / Non-Citable

Case
Samuel M. Salazar v. The State of Texas
Court
Texas Fourth Court of Appeals
Judge
Irene Rios (elected 2016); Lori I. Valenzuela (Greg Abbott, 2021); Lori Massey Brissette (Greg Abbott, 2024)
Date Decided
October 7, 2026
Docket No.
04-26-00183-CR
Topics
Criminal Appeals; Voluntary Dismissal; Appellate Procedure
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Samuel M. Salazar appealed from a proceeding in the 2nd 25th Judicial District Court of Guadalupe County, where Judge Jessica Crawford presided. The appellate court’s memorandum opinion does not describe the underlying charge, judgment, or issues that Salazar initially sought to raise.

Salazar subsequently filed a motion asking the Fourth Court of Appeals to dismiss the appeal. Both Salazar and his attorney signed the motion, as required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.2(a).

The Court’s Holding

The Fourth Court of Appeals granted Salazar’s motion and dismissed the appeal under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.2(a).

The court did not address the merits of the underlying criminal case or any potential appellate claims. Its disposition was limited to granting the appellant’s properly signed request for voluntary dismissal.

Key Takeaways

  • A criminal appellant may seek voluntary dismissal under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.2(a).
  • The dismissal motion was signed by both Salazar and his attorney.
  • The court dismissed the appeal without deciding any substantive issue.

Why It Matters

The decision illustrates the procedural requirements for voluntarily ending a Texas criminal appeal. When the appellant and counsel both sign a compliant dismissal motion, the appellate court may grant the request without reaching the merits.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top