Texas Case Summaries
Federal Enforcement »

Sage Veterinary Imaging v. Prater — Appeal dismissed on unopposed motion

Reported / Citable

Case
Sage Veterinary Imaging, PLLC v. Dr. Karin Prater
Court
Texas Court of Appeals, Eighth District (El Paso)
Date Decided
June 19, 2026
Docket No.
08-26-00168-CV (Trial Court No. D-1-GN-24-009650)
Topics
Appellate Procedure, Motion to Dismiss

Background

Sage Veterinary Imaging, PLLC appealed a decision from the 126th District Court in Travis County, Texas. The appeal was docketed in the Eighth Court of Appeals under case number 08-26-00168-CV.

The Court’s Holding

The court granted Sage Veterinary Imaging’s unopposed motion to dismiss the appeal under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.1(a)(1). The court also dismissed any other pending motions as moot. Costs are taxed against the appellant.

Key Takeaways

  • An appellant may seek dismissal of its own appeal at any stage of the appellate process.
  • When an appeal is dismissed on unopposed motion, no written opinion addressing the merits is issued.
  • The party seeking dismissal must bear the appellate costs associated with the dismissed appeal.

Why It Matters

This decision illustrates the appellate court’s streamlined handling of unopposed motions to dismiss under Rule 42.1. While the opinion provides no insight into the underlying veterinary imaging dispute, the case demonstrates the procedural mechanism by which litigants may withdraw appeals before the court issues a substantive opinion.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top