Texas Case Summaries
Federal Enforcement »

Rogers v. United States — Court adopted the unopposed recommendation and dismissed the case with prejudice

Reported / Citable

Case
Ronald Wayne Rogers, Jr. v. United States of America
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Sherman Division
Judge
Sean D. Jordan
Date Decided
August 28, 2026
Docket No.
4:23-cv-00364
Topics
Report and Recommendation, Unopposed Findings, Dismissal with Prejudice

Background

Ronald Wayne Rogers, Jr. brought this action against the United States. The district court referred the matter to a U.S. magistrate judge under 28 U.S.C. § 636.

On July 21, 2026, the magistrate judge issued a report proposing findings of fact and recommending that Rogers’s claims and lawsuit be dismissed with prejudice. No objections to the report were timely filed.

The Court’s Holding

District Judge Sean D. Jordan concluded that the magistrate judge’s findings and conclusions were correct. The court adopted them as its own findings and conclusions.

The court dismissed the case with prejudice. It also denied all motions that had not previously been decided.

Key Takeaways

  • The court adopted the magistrate judge’s report after no timely objections were filed.
  • The dismissal was with prejudice.
  • All previously unresolved motions were denied.

Why It Matters

The order ends the district-court action through adoption of the magistrate judge’s unopposed recommendation. The one-page opinion does not describe Rogers’s underlying claims or provide the magistrate judge’s substantive reasoning.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top