Texas Case Summaries
Federal Enforcement »

Pinckard v. Pace — Appeal dismissed for failure to file brief and non-compliance with clerk’s directive

Unreported / Non-Citable

Case
Kim Pinckard v. Melinda Strohmeyer Pace, Karen Strohmeyer Morgan, Anthony Kendrick Strohmeyer, Amy Ruth Strohmeyer Strazza, and Sara Ann Strohmeyer Hankins
Court
Texas Court of Appeals, Tenth District
Judge
Lee Harris (Greg Abbott, 2025)
Date Decided
June 18, 2026
Docket No.
10-26-00033-CV
Topics
Appellate Procedure, Failure to Prosecute, Default, Dismissal
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Kim Pinckard appealed from a judgment entered by the 249th District Court of Johnson County, Texas. The appeal was docketed in the Texas Court of Appeals, Tenth District, under case number 10-26-00033-CV.

The Clerk of the Court notified Pinckard that an appellant’s brief was due on or before May 7, 2026. Pinckard failed to file the brief by that deadline and did not request an extension. On May 14, 2026, the Clerk provided a second notice informing Pinckard that the brief had not been received and warning that failure to file the brief or a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal by June 4, 2026 would result in dismissal of the appeal.

Neither the required brief nor any response was filed by the June 4, 2026 deadline.

The Court’s Holding

The Court of Appeals dismissed the appeal for want of prosecution and for failure to comply with directives from the Clerk of the Court. The dismissal was entered pursuant to Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure § 42.3(b) and (c), which authorize dismissal when an appellant fails to timely file required documents despite notice from the court.

The opinion emphasizes that the appellant’s failure to file the brief—the foundational document of an appeal—combined with the failure to respond to two explicit notices from the Clerk, left the court with no choice but to dismiss. Strict compliance with appellate deadlines is a prerequisite to appellate review.

Key Takeaways

  • Appellants must file briefs within the time prescribed by the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, or their appeals face automatic dismissal.
  • Notices from the Clerk of the Court regarding missed deadlines must be heeded; failure to respond or comply results in dismissal for want of prosecution.
  • Extensions of time are available but must be requested before the deadline expires.
  • Dismissal for failure to prosecute is a severe sanction that terminates the right to appellate review without any consideration of the merits.

Why It Matters

This decision serves as a stark reminder of the unforgiving nature of appellate procedure. Missing a single filing deadline can extinguish an entire appeal, regardless of whether the underlying trial court decision was correct or meritorious. Appellate practitioners must maintain rigorous systems to track deadlines and must promptly request extensions when necessary.

For litigants, the case underscores the critical importance of engaging experienced appellate counsel and ensuring that all appellate deadlines are met. A trial court loss is not final until appellate rights are exhausted, but those rights evaporate quickly when deadlines are missed and the Clerk’s warnings are ignored.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top