Texas Case Summaries
Federal Enforcement »

Ortega-Gutierrez v. Blanche — Court dismissed the action with prejudice after granting respondents summary judgment

Unreported / Non-Citable

Case
Juan Antonio Ortega-Gutierrez v. Todd Blanche, et al.
Court
U.S. District Court — Southern District of Texas
Judge
SIM LAKE
Date Decided
July 17, 2026
Docket No.
4:26-cv-04116
Topics
Summary Judgment; Dismissal With Prejudice; Final Judgment

Background

Juan Antonio Ortega-Gutierrez filed this action against Todd Blanche and other respondents in the Southern District of Texas. The final judgment does not describe the underlying allegations, claims, or requested relief.

The respondents moved for summary judgment. In a separate Memorandum Opinion and Order, the court granted that motion; the provided document is the resulting final judgment.

The Court’s Holding

The court dismissed the action with prejudice in accordance with its order granting the respondents’ motion for summary judgment. The dismissal with prejudice ends the action and prevents the petitioner from refiling the same claims.

The court also taxed costs against Ortega-Gutierrez and designated the ruling as a final judgment. The one-page judgment does not provide the court’s reasoning for granting summary judgment.

Key Takeaways

  • The respondents obtained summary judgment.
  • The action was dismissed with prejudice.
  • Costs were taxed against the petitioner, and the court entered final judgment.

Why It Matters

The judgment conclusively resolves the district-court action in the respondents’ favor. Because the supplied document does not include the accompanying Memorandum Opinion and Order, it establishes the result but not the legal or factual basis for the summary-judgment ruling.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top