Texas Case Summaries

Munson v. TPLC29 LLC — Appeal dismissed after parties settled

Unreported / Non-Citable

Case
Matthew Munson v. TPLC29 LLC; TP1488 LLC; Lindsey Interest, L.L.C.; TPStorage, LLC; and Lindsey Commercial Properties LLC and Lock Away HWY 105 West, LLC; Pacific Reliant One, LLC Victoria Drive, LLC Lock Away FM 1488, LLC; Brundage/Clauson, LLC; and Strat Property Management, Inc.
Court
Texas Court of Appeals, First District
Date Decided
June 11, 2026
Docket No.
01-26-00335-CV
Topics
Voluntary Dismissal, Settlement, Appellate Procedure

Background

Matthew Munson appealed a judgment from the 152nd District Court of Harris County, Texas (Trial Court Case No. 2023-88171) against a group of commercial property entities including TPLC29 LLC, TP1488 LLC, Lindsey Interest, L.L.C., TPStorage, LLC, Lindsey Commercial Properties LLC, and related storage and property management companies. The underlying dispute arose in Harris County and involved multiple affiliated real estate and storage facility defendants.

Before the First Court of Appeals could reach the merits of the appeal, the parties resolved their differences through settlement and jointly moved to dismiss the appeal pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.1(a)(1).

The Court’s Holding

The court granted the parties’ joint motion and dismissed the appeal in its entirety. Acting per curiam, the panel of Justices Caughey, Johnson, and Dokupil issued a brief memorandum opinion citing Rule 42.1(a)(1), which authorizes dismissal upon the parties’ agreement.

All other pending motions in the appeal were dismissed as moot, as the settlement rendered further appellate proceedings unnecessary.

Key Takeaways

  • The appeal was dismissed by joint motion under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.1(a)(1) after the parties reached a settlement.
  • No merits ruling was issued; the opinion has no precedential value on the underlying substantive claims.
  • All other pending motions were dismissed as moot upon granting the dismissal.

Why It Matters

This disposition is a routine settlement-based dismissal and establishes no new legal precedent. It illustrates the Texas appellate courts’ deference to party autonomy in resolving disputes, permitting litigants to terminate an appeal at any stage upon mutual agreement.

For practitioners, the case is a reminder that Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.1(a)(1) provides a straightforward procedural mechanism to efficiently conclude an appeal once settlement is reached, without further court intervention on the merits.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top