Texas Case Summaries
Federal Enforcement »

Mundy v. Savell — appeal voluntarily dismissed after settlement

Reported / Citable

Case
Brett Mundy v. Donna Savell and Matthew McCollum
Court
Court of Appeals, Eighth District of Texas
Judge
MARIA SALAS MENDOZA (elected 2025)
Date Decided
July 31, 2026
Docket No.
08-26-00277-CV
Topics
appellate procedure, voluntary dismissal, settlement
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Brett Mundy appealed from a judgment or order entered by the 22nd District Court in Hays County. During the appeal, Mundy filed an unopposed motion to dismiss.

Mundy represented that the parties had reached an agreement resolving all claims in the underlying case. The parties, however, did not file their settlement agreement with the appellate clerk.

The Court’s Holding

The Eighth Court of Appeals granted Mundy’s motion and dismissed the appeal under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.1(a)(1), which permits dismissal on the appellant’s motion.

The court treated the request as a voluntary dismissal rather than relief based on a party agreement under Rule 42.1(a)(2), because no signed settlement agreement had been filed. It taxed costs against Mundy.

Key Takeaways

  • An appellant may obtain voluntary dismissal of an appeal under Rule 42.1(a)(1).
  • Relief effectuating a settlement under Rule 42.1(a)(2) requires filing the parties’ agreement with the appellate clerk.
  • Absent that filing, the court may dismiss the appeal without setting aside or otherwise altering the trial court’s judgment.

Why It Matters

The decision distinguishes a straightforward appellant-requested dismissal from settlement-based appellate relief. Parties seeking to have an appellate court render judgment on, remand for, or otherwise implement a settlement must provide the signed agreement required by Rule 42.1(a)(2).

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top