Texas Case Summaries
Federal Enforcement »

In re Nugehalli — Mandamus petition and emergency motion denied

Unreported / Non-Citable

Case
In re Sathish Nugehalli
Court
Texas Second Court of Appeals
Judge
Walker, J. (elected 2021); Sudderth, C.J. (Rick Perry, 2015); Wallach, J. (Greg Abbott, 2019)
Date Decided
October 2, 2026
Docket No.
02-26-00645-CV
Topics
Mandamus; Emergency Relief; Original Proceedings
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Sathish Nugehalli filed an original proceeding in the Texas Second Court of Appeals seeking a writ of mandamus. The proceeding arose from Tarrant County’s 325th District Court, trial court number 325-696378-21.

Nugehalli also filed an emergency motion for temporary relief. The memorandum opinion does not describe the underlying dispute, identify the trial-court action being challenged, or state the arguments supporting either request.

The Court’s Holding

The court denied Nugehalli’s petition for a writ of mandamus.

The court also denied his emergency motion for temporary relief. The per curiam memorandum opinion states only that the court considered the filings and concluded that relief should be denied; it provides no further reasoning.

Key Takeaways

  • The court denied the mandamus petition.
  • The court denied the emergency motion for temporary relief.
  • The memorandum opinion does not disclose the underlying facts, the challenged trial-court action, or the basis for denying relief.

Why It Matters

The decision resolves both requests presented to the appellate court, but its value as guidance is limited because the court did not explain its reasoning or describe the underlying controversy.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top