Texas Case Summaries
Federal Enforcement »

In re McClairne — Texas appeals court denied mandamus relief from a summary judgment

Unreported / Non-Citable

Case
In re Denard McClairne
Court
Texas First Court of Appeals
Judge
Justice Caughey; Justice Morgan; Justice Dokupil
Date Decided
October 30, 2026
Docket No.
01-26-01094-CV
Topics
Mandamus, Summary Judgment, Civil Procedure
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Denard McClairne brought an original proceeding seeking a writ of mandamus from the Texas First Court of Appeals. His petition challenged the trial court’s July 1, 2026 final judgment granting summary judgment to Pursuit Center, formerly known as The Center for Pursuit.

The underlying lawsuit was Denard McClairne v. The Center for Pursuit a/k/a CRI Federal Services, cause number 2025-37057, in the 270th District Court of Harris County. Judge Dedra Davis presided over that case.

The Court’s Holding

The court denied McClairne’s petition for a writ of mandamus.

The memorandum opinion did not provide further reasoning or discuss the standards governing mandamus relief. It therefore left the trial court’s summary-judgment ruling undisturbed without addressing the merits of that ruling in the opinion.

Key Takeaways

  • The court denied extraordinary mandamus relief from the trial court’s final summary judgment.
  • The decision did not explain why McClairne failed to qualify for mandamus relief.
  • The opinion did not reverse or modify the July 1, 2026 judgment in favor of Pursuit Center.

Why It Matters

The decision illustrates the limited practical guidance provided by a summary denial of mandamus relief. Although the challenged final judgment remains in place, the memorandum opinion does not establish a detailed rationale concerning the summary judgment or the requirements for mandamus.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top