Unreported / Non-Citable
Background
B.B. and N.B. filed a petition for a writ of mandamus in the Texas Second Court of Appeals. The original proceeding arose from Trial Court No. 25-13286-393 in Denton County’s 393rd District Court.
The real party in interest filed a response to the petition. The memorandum opinion does not describe the underlying dispute, the challenged trial-court action, or the arguments advanced by the parties.
The Court’s Holding
The court denied the petition for a writ of mandamus. It stated that it had considered both the relators’ petition and the real party in interest’s response and concluded that relief should be denied.
The per curiam memorandum opinion provided no further reasoning and did not address the merits of any underlying claims.
Key Takeaways
- The court denied B.B. and N.B.’s petition for mandamus relief.
- The court considered the petition and the real party in interest’s response before ruling.
- The brief memorandum opinion did not identify the underlying controversy or explain why mandamus relief was unavailable.
Why It Matters
The ruling leaves the challenged trial-court action undisturbed and ends this mandamus proceeding without extraordinary appellate relief.
Because the court supplied no substantive analysis, the opinion offers little guidance beyond its disposition of this particular petition.