Texas Case Summaries
Federal Enforcement »

Dauletbak v. Arvest Bank — court denies emergency restraining-order request

Reported / Citable

Case
Galym Dauletbak v. Arvest Bank, et al.
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Judge
Amos L. Mazzant
Date Decided
April 13, 2026
Docket No.
4:25-cv-01133
Topics
Temporary restraining order; Magistrate judge; Report and recommendation

Background

Galym Dauletbak sued Arvest Bank and other defendants in the Eastern District of Texas. The case was referred to a United States magistrate judge under 28 U.S.C. § 636.

Dauletbak filed an emergency motion for a temporary restraining order. On November 3, 2025, the magistrate judge recommended denying that motion. No party objected to the report and recommendation.

The Court’s Holding

District Judge Amos L. Mazzant adopted the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation in full, finding its conclusions correct after reviewing the report and other relevant filings.

The court denied Dauletbak’s emergency motion for a temporary restraining order. The memorandum does not state the factual basis for the requested relief or independently explain the reasons for denial; those grounds were contained in the adopted report.

Key Takeaways

  • The court denied the plaintiff’s emergency request for a temporary restraining order.
  • No party filed objections to the magistrate judge’s recommendation.
  • The district court adopted the recommendation as its own findings and conclusions.

Why It Matters

The ruling leaves the requested emergency injunctive relief unavailable to the plaintiff at this stage of the case. It also illustrates the procedural consequence of an unopposed magistrate judge recommendation: the district court may adopt it after review and enter the recommended disposition.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top