Texas Case Summaries
Federal Enforcement »

Victory Lakes FCERs v. Home Asset — Appeal dismissed following mediation settlement

Unreported / Non-Citable

Case
MPT of Victory Lakes FCER, LLC, MPT of Rosenberg FCER, LLC, and MPT of Katy 1463 FCER, LLC v. Home Asset, Inc., D/B/A Newquest Properties, A-S 85 Victory Lakes Town Center, L.P., Victory Lakes Town Center Partnership 85, LP, Brazos TC South Partnership A, L.P., and A-S 117 Shops at the Reserve, L.P.
Court
Texas Court of Appeals, First District
Judge
Caughey (Greg Abbott, 2017); Johnson (elected 2024)
Date Decided
June 23, 2026
Docket No.
01-26-00171-CV
Topics
Appellate Procedure, Settlement, Mediation, Motion to Dismiss
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

MPT of Victory Lakes FCER, LLC, MPT of Rosenberg FCER, LLC, and MPT of Katy 1463 FCER, LLC appealed a decision from the 268th District Court in Fort Bend County, Texas. The underlying case number was 22-DCV-293350.

Rather than proceeding to briefing and oral argument on the merits, the First Court of Appeals abated the appeal and referred the parties to mediation to explore settlement options.

The Court’s Holding

The parties successfully resolved their dispute through mediation and jointly moved to dismiss the appeal pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.1(a)(1). The court granted the motion.

The court lifted the abatement order, reinstated the appeal on the active docket, and dismissed it. All other pending motions were dismissed as moot.

Key Takeaways

  • The appeal was settled through mediation before the court reached the merits of the parties’ claims.
  • The court granted the joint motion to dismiss under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.1(a)(1).
  • No legal ruling was issued on the substantive dispute.

Why It Matters

While this opinion does not establish precedent on the underlying substantive claims, it reflects the appellate court’s practice of facilitating settlement discussions through abatement and mediation. This procedural mechanism can resolve disputes without consuming appellate resources or establishing binding legal precedent.

The settlement demonstrates that parties to complex commercial disputes may achieve resolution even after litigation has reached the appellate stage.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top