Reported / Citable
Background
Karsan Parmar sued Google LLC and other defendants in the Eastern District of Texas. Parmar moved for a temporary restraining order.
The matter was referred to a United States magistrate judge under 28 U.S.C. § 636. On September 3, 2026, the magistrate judge recommended denying Parmar’s motion. Parmar filed objections to that report and recommendation.
The Court’s Holding
District Judge Sean D. Jordan conducted a de novo review of Parmar’s objections and the portions of the report to which Parmar specifically objected.
The court concluded that the magistrate judge’s findings and conclusions were correct and that Parmar’s objections lacked merit as to the magistrate judge’s ultimate findings. It adopted the report and recommendation and denied the motion for a temporary restraining order.
Key Takeaways
- The court adopted the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation in full.
- The court reviewed Parmar’s specific objections de novo.
- Parmar’s motion for a temporary restraining order was denied.
Why It Matters
The order leaves Parmar without the requested immediate injunctive relief at this stage of the litigation. It also illustrates that objections to a magistrate judge’s recommendation will not alter the result when the district court finds the recommendation correct after de novo review.