Reported / Citable
Background
Santiago Meneses-Perez appeared with counsel for a plea hearing on an indictment charging improper use of another person’s passport, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1544.
After receiving the required Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11 admonishments, Meneses-Perez pleaded guilty before U.S. Magistrate Judge Laura Enriquez. He consented to proceedings before the magistrate judge, subject to final approval and sentencing by the presiding district judge.
The Court’s Holding
Judge Enriquez found that Meneses-Perez understood the charge, the rights he waived by pleading guilty, the potential penalties, the immigration consequences, and the advisory role of the Sentencing Guidelines. The court also found him competent and determined that his plea was knowing, voluntary, and not induced by promises or coercion.
The magistrate judge further found a factual basis for the plea and recommended that the district judge accept the guilty plea and enter a judgment of guilt. The report was a recommendation, not a final acceptance of the plea or sentencing decision.
Key Takeaways
- The magistrate judge recommended acceptance of Meneses-Perez’s guilty plea to improper use of another person’s passport.
- The plea remains subject to final approval and sentencing by the district judge.
- Written objections to the report and recommendation are due within 14 days of service.
Why It Matters
The ruling documents completion of the Rule 11 plea colloquy and clears the case for the district judge to decide whether to accept the plea and proceed to sentencing. It also preserves the parties’ opportunity to object to the magistrate judge’s findings and recommendation.