Texas Case Summaries
Federal Enforcement »

In re Omni Hotels Management Corp. — Mandamus petition and stay motion denied

Unreported / Non-Citable

Case
In re Omni Hotels Management Corporation; Barton Creek Resorts, LLC; and Omni Barton Creek, Inc.
Court
Texas Court of Appeals, Third District, at Austin
Judge
Justices Triana; Crump; Ellis
Date Decided
October 9, 2026
Docket No.
03-26-00895-CV
Topics
Mandamus, Motion to Stay, Appellate Procedure
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Omni Hotels Management Corporation, Barton Creek Resorts, LLC, and Omni Barton Creek, Inc. sought mandamus relief in an original proceeding arising from Travis County.

The relators also filed a motion to stay. The memorandum opinion does not identify the ruling at issue, describe the underlying dispute, or state the arguments supporting either request.

The Court’s Holding

The Third Court of Appeals denied the petition for writ of mandamus and the motion to stay.

The court cited Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 52.8(a), which governs denial of mandamus relief when the court concludes from the petition and any response that the relator is not entitled to the relief sought. The opinion provided no further explanation for the denial.

Key Takeaways

  • The court denied the relators’ petition for writ of mandamus.
  • The court also denied the relators’ motion to stay.
  • The memorandum opinion identified no underlying ruling, facts, arguments, or additional rationale.

Why It Matters

The decision resolves the mandamus petition and stay motion before the Third Court of Appeals. Because the opinion states only the disposition and cites Rule 52.8(a), it does not reveal the factual or legal basis for the requested relief or the court’s reasons for denying it.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top