Texas Case Summaries
Federal Enforcement »

In re Griffin — Texas appeals court denied mandamus relief

Unreported / Non-Citable

Case
In re Pamela Griffin, Jose Orta, Carrie D’Anna, and Sarah Winters
Court
Texas Court of Appeals, Third District, at Austin
Judge
Chief Justice Byrne; Justice Kelly; Justice Theofanis
Date Decided
October 8, 2026
Docket No.
03-26-00652-CV
Topics
Mandamus, Appellate Procedure
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Pamela Griffin, Jose Orta, Carrie D’Anna, and Sarah Winters filed an original proceeding seeking a writ of mandamus from the Texas Court of Appeals for the Third District.

The memorandum opinion does not identify the relief the relators requested, describe the circumstances giving rise to the proceeding, or provide additional procedural or factual background.

The Court’s Holding

The court denied the petition for a writ of mandamus.

The court cited Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure 52.8(a) and 52.8(d). It provided no further explanation for the denial.

Key Takeaways

  • The Third Court of Appeals denied the relators’ mandamus petition.
  • The disposition was issued in a memorandum opinion.
  • The opinion supplies no factual discussion or explanation of the basis for denial.

Why It Matters

The opinion records the denial of mandamus relief but offers no reasoning or factual detail from which broader guidance can be drawn.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top