Texas Case Summaries
Federal Enforcement »

United States v. Jackson — Court accepted guilty plea and adjudged defendant guilty of methamphetamine distribution offense

Reported / Citable

Case
United States of America v. Luther Levann Jackson, Jr.
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Judge
Marcia A. Crone
Date Decided
October 2, 2026
Docket No.
9:26-cr-00014
Topics
Guilty Plea; Methamphetamine; Drug Distribution

Background

The district court referred the administration of Luther Levann Jackson, Jr.’s guilty plea to U.S. Magistrate Judge Zack Hawthorn under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11. After conducting the plea hearing, Judge Hawthorn issued findings of fact and recommended that the district court accept Jackson’s plea and adjudge him guilty on Count One of the indictment.

Neither party objected to the magistrate judge’s findings and recommendation. Count One charged Jackson with violating 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) by possessing with intent to distribute and distributing actual methamphetamine.

The Court’s Holding

The district court adopted the magistrate judge’s findings of fact and recommendation and accepted Jackson’s guilty plea. In accordance with the plea and the adopted recommendation, the court adjudged Jackson guilty on Count One.

The court also ordered defense counsel to review and discuss the presentence report with Jackson and to file any objections before the sentencing hearing.

Key Takeaways

  • The court accepted Jackson’s Rule 11 guilty plea after no party objected to the magistrate judge’s findings and recommendation.
  • Jackson was adjudged guilty of possessing with intent to distribute and distributing actual methamphetamine under 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1).
  • Defense counsel must review the presentence report with Jackson and submit any objections before sentencing.

Why It Matters

The order formally resolves the guilt phase as to Count One and moves the case into sentencing proceedings. It also preserves the parties’ opportunity to raise timely objections to the presentence report before the sentencing hearing.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top