Texas Case Summaries
Federal Enforcement »

United States v. Valladares-Garcia — magistrate judge recommends accepting guilty plea

Reported / Citable

Case
United States of America v. Darmin Francisco Valladares-Garcia
Court
U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas
Judge
Joseph A. Cordova
Date Decided
August 28, 2026
Docket No.
DR:26-CR-02176(1)-AM
Topics
Illegal reentry; Guilty plea; Rule 11; Magistrate judge

Background

Darmin Francisco Valladares-Garcia appeared with counsel before Magistrate Judge Joseph A. Cordova for a felony guilty-plea proceeding referred under a general order. The magistrate judge advised Valladares-Garcia that he could have his plea taken by the district judge and gave the Rule 11 admonishments.

With counsel’s advice, Valladares-Garcia consented to the magistrate judge taking his plea. He pleaded guilty, without a plea agreement, to Count One of the indictment: illegal reentry into the United States, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326.

The Court’s Holding

The magistrate judge found that Valladares-Garcia understood the charge, potential penalties, and his constitutional and statutory rights; voluntarily waived those rights; and was competent to plead guilty. The judge also found that the plea was knowing and voluntary and supported by a sufficient factual basis.

The magistrate judge found Valladares-Garcia guilty of the charged offense and recommended that the district court accept the plea and enter a judgment of guilt. The matter was referred to Chief U.S. District Judge Alia Moses for sentencing.

Key Takeaways

  • The defendant pleaded guilty to illegal reentry under 8 U.S.C. § 1326 without a plea agreement.
  • The magistrate judge found the Rule 11 plea requirements satisfied.
  • The recommendation remained subject to objections and district-court review before acceptance and sentencing.

Why It Matters

The filing is a magistrate judge’s findings and recommendation, not a final sentencing decision. It documents a valid guilty plea and recommends its acceptance, while preserving the parties’ 14-day period to object.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top