Texas Case Summaries
Federal Enforcement »

USA v. Sagastume-Pineda — magistrate judge recommends accepting guilty plea

Reported / Citable

Case
United States of America v. Jose Maria Sagastume-Pineda
Court
U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas
Judge
Joseph A. Cordova
Date Decided
August 27, 2026
Docket No.
2:26-cr-02327
Topics
Illegal reentry; Guilty plea; Rule 11

Background

Jose Maria Sagastume-Pineda appeared with counsel before U.S. Magistrate Judge Joseph A. Cordova for a felony guilty-plea proceeding. The matter had been referred to the magistrate judge to take the plea.

After receiving Rule 11 admonishments, Sagastume-Pineda pleaded guilty without a plea agreement to Count One, charging illegal reentry into the United States in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Sentencing remains before the presiding district judge.

The Court’s Holding

Judge Cordova found that Sagastume-Pineda consented to having the magistrate judge take his plea; understood the charge, penalties, and rights he waived; was competent; and entered the plea knowingly, freely, and voluntarily.

The magistrate judge also found a sufficient factual basis for the plea and found Sagastume-Pineda guilty of Count One. The report and recommendation recommends that the district judge accept the plea and enter a judgment of guilt.

Key Takeaways

  • The defendant pleaded guilty to illegal reentry under 8 U.S.C. § 1326 without a plea agreement.
  • The magistrate judge found the Rule 11 requirements satisfied and a factual basis for the plea.
  • The recommendation is subject to objections and awaits action by the district judge.

Why It Matters

This is a guilty-plea recommendation, not a final acceptance order or sentencing decision. Unless timely objections are filed, the district judge may accept the recommendation and proceed to sentencing.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top