Texas Case Summaries
Federal Enforcement »

Williams v. Capital One Auto Finance — complaint dismissed without prejudice with 14 days to amend

Reported / Citable

Case
Tikesha Williams v. Capital One Auto Finance
Court
U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Texas
Judge
Amos L. Mazzant
Date Decided
September 16, 2026
Docket No.
4:26-cv-00839
Topics
civil procedure; magistrate judge; pleading; dismissal without prejudice

Background

Tikesha Williams sued Capital One Auto Finance in the Eastern District of Texas. The case was referred to a United States magistrate judge under 28 U.S.C. § 636.

On August 10, 2026, the magistrate judge recommended dismissal of Williams’s complaint. The order does not describe the complaint’s allegations or the basis for the recommendation.

The Court’s Holding

District Judge Amos L. Mazzant adopted the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation after no timely objections were filed. The court concluded that the report’s findings and conclusions were correct.

The court dismissed the complaint without prejudice. Williams may file an amended complaint within 14 days after the order was docketed; otherwise, the complaint will be dismissed with prejudice.

Key Takeaways

  • No timely objections were filed to the magistrate judge’s recommendation.
  • The complaint was dismissed without prejudice, not finally dismissed at this stage.
  • The plaintiff has 14 days from docketing to amend or face dismissal with prejudice.

Why It Matters

The order preserves Williams’s opportunity to cure the complaint through amendment while making clear that failing to do so will result in a with-prejudice dismissal. It also illustrates the consequence of not timely objecting to a magistrate judge’s recommendation.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top