Texas Case Summaries
Federal Enforcement »

USA v. Romero-Herrera — magistrate judge recommends accepting guilty plea to illegal reentry

Reported / Citable

Case
United States of America v. Jean Franco Romero-Herrera
Court
U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas
Judge
Matthew H. Watters
Date Decided
August 20, 2026
Docket No.
DR:26-CR-01561(1)-AM
Topics
criminal procedure; guilty plea; illegal reentry

Background

Jean Franco Romero-Herrera appeared with counsel before a magistrate judge for a felony guilty-plea proceeding. He consented to having the magistrate judge take his plea, while sentencing was reserved for Chief U.S. District Judge Alia Moses.

Romero-Herrera pleaded guilty, without a plea agreement, to Count One of the indictment, charging illegal reentry into the United States.

The Court’s Holding

Magistrate Judge Matthew H. Watters found that Romero-Herrera understood the charge, potential penalties, and his rights; knowingly and voluntarily waived those rights; was competent; and entered his guilty plea freely and voluntarily.

The magistrate judge also found a sufficient factual basis for the plea and found Romero-Herrera guilty of the count to which he pleaded. The judge recommended that the district court accept the plea and enter a judgment of guilt, then referred the matter to the presiding district judge for sentencing.

Key Takeaways

  • The defendant pleaded guilty to illegal reentry without a plea agreement.
  • The magistrate judge found the Rule 11 plea requirements satisfied.
  • The recommendation remains subject to objections and district-court review before sentencing.

Why It Matters

The filing is a magistrate judge’s findings and recommendation, not a final sentencing decision. It establishes the factual and procedural basis for the district court to accept the guilty plea and proceed to sentencing.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top