Texas Case Summaries
Federal Enforcement »

Mariscal v. Fast Responder Towing — Court allows FLSA claim against towing company president to proceed

Unreported / Non-Citable

Case
Marquis Mariscal, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. Fast Responder Towing LLC, d/b/a JLS Towing, and Summer Settle
Court
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Judge
Brantley Starr
Date Decided
August 31, 2026
Docket No.
3:25-cv-01916
Topics
FLSA, Overtime, Individual Liability, Corporate Officers

Background

Marquis Mariscal, a former tow truck driver for Fast Responder Towing LLC, doing business as JLS Towing, brought a proposed collective action under the Fair Labor Standards Act. He alleged that the defendants paid drivers a fixed amount for each vehicle transported and failed to pay time-and-one-half overtime when they worked more than 40 hours in a workweek.

Mariscal also alleged that JLS Towing president Summer Settle directed and actively operated the company and had decisionmaking authority over employment matters, including his pay. Settle moved under Rule 12(b)(6) to dismiss the claims against her, arguing that Texas law’s corporate veil protected her from personal liability.

The Court’s Holding

The court denied Settle’s motion to dismiss. It explained that the FLSA’s definition of “employer” can encompass individuals and that, under controlling Fifth Circuit precedent, a corporate officer who exercises operational control over a covered enterprise’s workers may qualify as an employer and be jointly and severally liable for unpaid wages.

The court concluded that Mariscal plausibly alleged operational control by asserting that Settle directed and actively operated JLS Towing and possessed decisionmaking power over his employment and compensation. Although the court noted concerns expressed by district courts about whether the FLSA displaces state-law limits on corporate liability, it held that existing Fifth Circuit precedent foreclosed Settle’s corporate-veil argument at this stage.

Key Takeaways

  • A corporate officer may qualify as an employer under the FLSA when the officer exercises operational control over the company’s workers.
  • Corporate title alone is insufficient, but allegations of authority over employment matters and employee pay can support individual liability at the pleading stage.
  • Texas statutory protections for LLC members and managers did not require dismissal because controlling Fifth Circuit precedent governed the FLSA employer analysis.

Why It Matters

The ruling permits Mariscal’s overtime claim against Settle to proceed alongside the claim against JLS Towing; it does not decide whether she ultimately exercised operational control or is liable for unpaid wages. The opinion underscores that owners and officers may face personal exposure in Fifth Circuit FLSA cases when a complaint plausibly connects them to employment and compensation decisions.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top