Texas Case Summaries
Federal Enforcement »

Booker v. Dobbins — Court adopted recommendation to dismiss for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction

Reported / Citable

Case
Kedrien Booker v. Clifton Yodell Dobbins
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Judge
Marcia A. Crone
Date Decided
August 31, 2026
Docket No.
9:25-cv-00296
Topics
Section 1983, Subject-Matter Jurisdiction, Report and Recommendation

Background

Kedrien Booker, an inmate formerly confined at the Texas Department of Criminal Justice’s Michael Unit, filed this pro se civil action against Clifton Yodell Dobbins under 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

The district court referred the matter to U.S. Magistrate Judge Zack Hawthorn. On May 10, 2026, the magistrate judge recommended dismissing the action for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. No objections were filed; the copy sent to Booker was returned with a notation that he had been discharged.

The Court’s Holding

After reviewing the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation, the record, the pleadings, and the available evidence, the district court found the magistrate judge’s factual findings and legal conclusions correct.

The court therefore adopted the report and recommendation. The order did not itself enter dismissal; it stated that a separate final judgment would be entered in accordance with the magistrate judge’s recommendation.

Key Takeaways

  • The court adopted the recommendation that Booker’s Section 1983 action be dismissed for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction.
  • No party filed objections to the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation.
  • A separate final judgment was to follow the adoption order.

Why It Matters

The order accepts the magistrate judge’s jurisdictional analysis and moves the case toward final judgment without addressing the merits of Booker’s claims in the supplied opinion.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top