Texas Case Summaries
Federal Enforcement »

United States v. Ralios-Coj — magistrate judge recommends accepting guilty plea and continued detention

Reported / Citable

Case
United States of America v. Juan Ralios-Coj
Court
U.S. District Court — Northern District of Texas
Judge
Not specified
Date Decided
August 21, 2026
Docket No.
2:26-cr-00073-Z-BR
Topics
Criminal procedure; Guilty plea; Illegal reentry; Pretrial detention

Background

Juan Ralios-Coj appeared before a United States magistrate judge under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11 and, by consent, pleaded guilty to Count 1 of the indictment.

The charge was illegal reentry after deportation under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). Ralios-Coj was in custody when the magistrate judge issued the report and recommendation.

The Court’s Holding

After advising and examining Ralios-Coj under oath on the Rule 11 subjects, the magistrate judge found that his guilty plea was knowing and voluntary.

The magistrate judge also found an independent factual basis supporting every essential element of the charged offense. The report recommends that the district judge accept the plea, adjudge Ralios-Coj guilty, impose sentence accordingly, and order him to remain in custody after conviction.

Key Takeaways

  • The magistrate judge recommended acceptance of Ralios-Coj’s guilty plea to illegal reentry after deportation.
  • The recommendation rests on findings that the plea was knowing, voluntary, and supported by an independent factual basis.
  • Written objections to the report and recommendation are due within 14 days of service.

Why It Matters

This is a Rule 11 plea recommendation, not a final acceptance of the plea or sentencing decision. The assigned district judge retains responsibility for acting on the recommendation after the objection period.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top