Texas Case Summaries
Federal Enforcement »

United States v. Prater — court accepts guilty plea to wire-fraud conspiracy

Reported / Citable

Case
United States of America v. Keisha Belinda Prater
Court
U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Texas
Judge
Jeremy D. Kernodle
Date Decided
August 26, 2026
Docket No.
6:25-cr-00151-JDK-KNM
Topics
Wire fraud; Guilty plea; Rule 11; Criminal procedure

Background

The United States charged Keisha Belinda Prater in Count One of the indictment with conspiracy to commit wire fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1349.

The district court referred administration of Prater’s guilty plea to U.S. Magistrate Judge K. Nicole Mitchell under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11. After conducting the plea hearing, the magistrate judge recommended that the court accept the plea and adjudge Prater guilty. Neither party objected to the findings or recommendation.

The Court’s Holding

District Judge Jeremy D. Kernodle adopted the magistrate judge’s Findings of Fact and Recommendation on Guilty Plea. The court accepted Prater’s guilty plea and found her guilty of Count One, conspiracy to commit wire fraud under § 1349.

The court did not yet accept the parties’ plea agreement. It deferred that decision until after reviewing the presentence report.

Key Takeaways

  • The court adopted the unopposed Rule 11 plea recommendation.
  • Prater was adjudged guilty of conspiracy to commit wire fraud under 18 U.S.C. § 1349.
  • Acceptance of the plea agreement remains deferred pending review of the presentence report.

Why It Matters

The order resolves Prater’s guilt on the charged wire-fraud-conspiracy count while preserving the court’s ability to assess the plea agreement after reviewing sentencing information. The case will therefore proceed to presentence review and sentencing-related proceedings.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top