Reported / Citable
Background
Jose Javier Pineda-Solorio appeared with counsel before Magistrate Judge Matthew H. Watters for entry of a felony guilty plea. The matter had been referred to the magistrate judge under a general order for taking the plea.
After receiving Rule 11 admonishments, Pineda-Solorio consented to plea proceedings before the magistrate judge and pleaded guilty, without a plea agreement, to Count One of the indictment: illegal reentry into the United States. Sentencing remains for the presiding district judge.
The Court’s Holding
The magistrate judge found that Pineda-Solorio understood the charge, penalties, and rights at issue; knowingly and voluntarily waived his rights; was competent to plead; and had entered the plea freely and voluntarily. The court also found an adequate factual basis for the plea.
Judge Watters found Pineda-Solorio guilty of the charge to which he pleaded and recommended that the district court accept the guilty plea and enter a judgment of guilt. The recommendation advised the parties that objections must be filed within 14 days.
Key Takeaways
- The defendant pleaded guilty without a plea agreement to illegal reentry.
- The magistrate judge found the Rule 11 requirements satisfied, including competency, voluntariness, and a factual basis.
- The recommendation, not a final plea-acceptance order, was referred to Chief Judge Alia Moses for further proceedings and sentencing.
Why It Matters
The decision illustrates the magistrate-judge plea process in a felony case when the defendant consents and the district judge retains responsibility for sentencing. It also preserves the parties’ opportunity to object to the proposed findings before district-court review.