Texas Case Summaries
Federal Enforcement »

USA v. Reyes — magistrate judge recommends accepting guilty plea in alien-transport conspiracy case

Reported / Citable

Case
United States of America v. Pricila Reyes
Court
U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas, Del Rio Division
Judge
Matthew H. Watters, United States Magistrate Judge
Date Decided
August 3, 2026
Docket No.
DR:26-CR-01681(1)-AM
Topics
Guilty pleas; Alien transportation; Rule 11; Magistrate judges

Background

Pricila Reyes appeared with counsel before U.S. Magistrate Judge Matthew H. Watters for the taking of a felony guilty plea. The matter had been referred under a general order, and Reyes consented to having the magistrate judge take her plea; sentencing remains for the presiding district judge.

After receiving Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11 admonishments, Reyes pleaded guilty under a plea agreement to Count One of the indictment, conspiracy to transport illegal aliens.

The Court’s Holding

Judge Watters found that Reyes understood the charge, possible penalties, and her constitutional and statutory rights, and that she knowingly and voluntarily waived those rights. The magistrate judge also found Reyes competent, her plea voluntary, and a sufficient factual basis supporting it.

The findings state that Reyes is guilty of the offense to which she pleaded and acknowledge that restitution may be imposed. The magistrate judge recommended that the district court accept the plea and enter a judgment of guilt. The parties have 14 days to object to the recommendation.

Key Takeaways

  • Reyes pleaded guilty to conspiracy to transport illegal aliens under a plea agreement.
  • The magistrate judge found the Rule 11 requirements satisfied, including competency, voluntariness, and a factual basis.
  • The recommendation is subject to district-court review and timely objections before acceptance and sentencing.

Why It Matters

The filing is a report and recommendation rather than a final district-court acceptance of the plea or a sentencing decision. It documents the plea colloquy findings that support acceptance while preserving the parties’ opportunity to object.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top