Texas Case Summaries
Federal Enforcement »

In re Beckstrand — Mandamus petition denied

Unreported / Non-Citable

Case
In re Kevin Roy Beckstrand
Court
Texas Second Court of Appeals
Judge
Justice Bassel (Greg Abbott, 2018); Birdwell (Greg Abbott, 2017)
Date Decided
August 5, 2026
Docket No.
02-26-00519-CV
Topics
Mandamus; Original Proceeding; Appellate Procedure
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Kevin Roy Beckstrand filed a petition for a writ of mandamus in the Texas Second Court of Appeals. The petition arose from Trial Court No. 1868553 in the 485th District Court of Tarrant County, Texas.

The memorandum opinion does not identify the challenged trial-court action, describe Beckstrand’s arguments, or provide the underlying facts. The matter reached the appellate court as an original proceeding.

The Court’s Holding

The court denied Beckstrand’s petition for a writ of mandamus. It stated only that it had considered the petition and was of the opinion that relief should be denied.

The per curiam memorandum opinion did not provide substantive reasoning or address the elements required for mandamus relief. It therefore establishes only that the requested extraordinary relief was denied on the petition presented.

Key Takeaways

  • The Texas Second Court of Appeals denied Beckstrand’s mandamus petition.
  • The court issued a brief per curiam memorandum opinion without explaining its reasoning.
  • The opinion does not disclose the underlying dispute or the trial-court ruling Beckstrand challenged.

Why It Matters

The decision leaves the challenged trial-court action undisturbed and provides no substantive guidance beyond the denial of relief in this original proceeding. Because the opinion contains no factual or legal analysis, practitioners should not read it as announcing a broader rule concerning mandamus standards.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top