Texas Case Summaries
Federal Enforcement »

In re Hendricks — Mandamus petition denied

Unreported / Non-Citable

Case
In re Madyson Rae Hendricks
Court
Texas Tenth Court of Appeals
Judge
Johnson (appointment info not available); Smith (appointment info not available)
Date Decided
August 6, 2026
Docket No.
10-26-00315-CR
Topics
Mandamus, Original Proceeding, Criminal Law
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Madyson Rae Hendricks filed a petition for a writ of mandamus in the Texas Tenth Court of Appeals. The matter came before the court as an original proceeding.

The memorandum opinion does not describe the underlying criminal case, the relief Hendricks requested, or the arguments presented in support of the petition.

The Court’s Holding

The court denied Hendricks’s petition for a writ of mandamus under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 52.8.

The per curiam opinion provided no additional reasoning or analysis. The court designated the opinion “Do not publish.”

Key Takeaways

  • The Texas Tenth Court of Appeals denied Hendricks’s mandamus petition.
  • The ruling arose from an original proceeding.
  • The court did not explain the factual or legal basis for the denial.

Why It Matters

The decision ends this mandamus proceeding without granting Hendricks extraordinary relief. Because the brief memorandum opinion contains no discussion of the underlying dispute or governing standards, it offers little guidance beyond the denial itself.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top